We can has revolutionized the Spanish political scene, and COUNTRY aware of the benefits that this movement awakens in his readers, has devoted ample space. Proof of this is the deployment carried out between 18 and 28 October, coinciding with the celebration of the constituent assembly of the platform, and further processing of voting papers on internal structure and strategy from their bases. If you have not miscounted, have been devoted to this chapter nine fact chronicles six opinion pieces and editorial. That with regard to the hard copy. In digital, the figure rises considerably with multimedia inputs. From all this material, two texts have provoked critical messages from readers, the editorial of October 19, entitled can be organized and a chronic posted on Monday October 27 in the print edition (the evening of October 26 in digital) under the title Pablo Iglesias longs to have a television if he becomes president. I’ll take care of the information, in view of the many reactions that have provoked. Illustrated with a photo of Churches, occupied four columns and was signed by THE COUNTRY.
The text referred to the interview leader we issued Sunday night October 26th for the chain LaSexta TV the Saved journalist Jordi Évole. Indeed, the reference to the conversation was confined almost entirely to the response given to the question Churches that made him Évole whether you would like to have a TV show to respond to citizens, if arriving at La Moncloa. Readers have written me look at the headline and in the references given in the text a deliberate attempt to distort the content of the interview. Maria Paz Salido sends a short message to the Ombudsman. “Listen to the interview yourself Évole Jordi Pablo Iglesias issued on Sunday night and then read the headline on this topic drew HOME Monday 27: Pablo Iglesias craves a television if President ‘. That’s lying. “
Maria Jose Contreras complains that a verb is used,” craving “which is, he says,” a clear distortion that does not conform to what the politician said. Jordi Évole In fact I had to insist that the question did not answer clearly Churches (if craved would have voted emphatically). ” Miguel Pousada says. “It is unreasonable for the program Saved Such a conclusion is drawn and is wildly exaggerated use the word eager I am a regular reader of this journal and am writing to increasingly more difficult for me to read some news, especially those related to Can “. Another reader, Manuel Corral, refers to the article with a word: “Bullshit.” Alfonso Ceberio states: “Anyone who saw the interview would realize that under that headline can only hide an evil intent.” He adds: “The unreported deducted from these statements comparable manipulative egocentric ( Oh my God ) to Chavez, with which coincidentally has been linked day in and day”
David Alandete, deputy director of El País, answers to readers. “In his television interview Pablo Iglesias was asked about the possibility of having a TV show if he were to win the presidency. He said: “Can you imagine … host, that would be cool, to face a president who meet once a month with five journalists bastards like you rather roll now, plasma or two questions? of colleagues. Just yes. ” He used the “host”, a colloquial expression that the Royal Academy described as similar to slang “a lot”, “abundant”, hence we choose the word “crave” in the headline, explaining later in that space would respond “Citizens from the chairmanship of the Government.” In chronic, COUNTRY gave a detailed account of many other ideas and proposals shelled by the leader can. No implied or explicit criticism in the headline.
The interview Évole to Pablo Iglesias, I’ve bothered to watch is 58 minutes long, and the news is devoted barely alluded twenty lines, leading a pre conceived as a text in which it was announced that we would submit that Monday its structure and strategy, voted by 190,000 people. “Being a prior, we include the element of the interview, which was new, and have entitled him. Later gave extensive information on voting results in Can “Alandete explains.
I understand newsworthiness prior to updating a reference to the interview, but I think I dedicate a four-column headline, we should have reflected more fully in the text
.
Crave is a verb that implies a desire vehement, according to RAE
As to crave verb, main object of criticism, its meaning is simply to “eagerly desire”. Which brings us to the term “anxiety”, the dictionary of the Royal Academy defines “vehement desire or impatient.” The Ideological Dictionary Julio Casares, under the term “anxiety” means: “distress, restlessness.” I do not appreciate any uneasiness or vehemently response Iglesias said.
In other news, or rather its absence, has been the subject these days of protest letters. Some readers cast in missing a mention in the diary to the demonstration on October 24 in Oviedo organized to coincide with the visit of the Kings to the city to deliver the Prince of Asturias Awards. The issue was mentioned in passing in a couple of lines chronicle the Culture section.
A reader, Francisco Carantoña writes me as follows, “even though I am fifty, still retain some ingenuity and not lose hope my opinion, that certainly is to many more readers, can influence the drift of the newspaper of which I am a subscriber and reader from the first issue is corrected. He left me amazed that neither the website nor in the print edition of today [October 25] The minimal mention of the Republican demonstration yesterday received the Kings appear when they approached the Campoamor theater in Oviedo. “
Francisco Javier García notes, meanwhile, refieriendo the same act: “It is assumed that there was a march for dignity protesting cuts that have been submitted from the various administrations, and I say supposed, because in the print edition of the newspaper on 25 October, the protests had no place, a disappointment than it took me to was my long newspaper. Now they seem to have more room in it the writings of Mr. Rajoy and Mrs. Booty “.
Jorge A. Rodriguez, head of News apologizes for this omission. “If readers they missed about the protests in Oviedo is because, no doubt, was an error of judgment not to refer to the traditional event that accompanies the awards, which yes we referred in the editions of 2012 and 2013. However, the awards were covered by a single editor, who for security of the royal household, had to go well in advance at the theater, so it could not be both inside the auditorium and the arrival of the Kings. It’s not an excuse, since he had teletypes, but it’s reality. ” Indeed, agencies, and other media reported the concentration itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment