With what happens on television in Colombia, allegory may be relevant, at least as to the confusion of tongues. forums multiply (the next is on Friday in Medellin), studies and projects to define the future of television and build a public policy television and audiovisual content, but is it possible to coordinate many theories and egos? Remember that humility is not the most common virtue in academia or in power.
A couple of weeks ago, the Commission for Communications Regulation (CRC) published on its website the document “Analysis Audiovisual markets in a converged environment, “along with a draft regulation and study habits and uses of television consumers, supported in a survey conducted by the firm YanHass.
there will be time for judiciously evaluate these products, but since it is necessary to raise -from the legal and if the CRC has as much regulatory power as intended and, from what fáctico- whether the decisions of the entity can counter the effects on the market conduct multiple agents that are beyond their regulatory orbit. What can not happen is upregulated end up local businesses and their ability to survive drowning. It would be a fatal blow to public television and Colombian audiovisual industry.
As evidence that would be climbing the steps of the tower of Babel, it is inexplicable that at this stage neither a letter of work is known to he hired the National television Authority (ANTV) with the National University for a “comprehensive television” and prepare the necessary documents to award future concessions television service study. Neither is known about the conclusions arrived at by the three gurus who hired the same entity. What is the reason for so much secrecy?
@jcgomez_j
No comments:
Post a Comment