In its reasons not appear even once the word “television”, then we need to dig into other documents to find the reasons alleged authors of the project to give similar treatment to this medium.
hardly be justified that a design inspired by the principles of peace, equality and education, instead of drawing guidelines for strengthening television, devote plan to put a patch there, a patch there, of desultory fashion with no philosophy or guiding principle for deciphering where we want to lead this industry in the “new country”.
Have you reached the final hour national television industry? Did you want to deliver Channel One to one company? Is domestic production is negligible and foreign canned are preferred? Do you want to finally issue the death certificate television before the internet boom? Does the ICT sector is going to take a big chunk of the resources of television?
Is it true that will disappear National Television Authority (ANTV) in use of extraordinary powers requesting the Government in the draft Development Plan? What was the law of television policy was promised when he took off his constitutional regulation of the television service?
These and other questions lead to think that, under the guidelines of good governance The issue deserves more sindéresis television. Hopefully in the Congress wisdom is imposed by excluding from the Development Plan snippets with you want upholstering the screen.
Amid the bleak picture of the regulation of television in Colombia, should be noted that this country is about to become a sort of Somalia in the field of copyright. That way lead us argue without blushing that as a general principle, it is lawful to deprive intellectual property to reign freedom of information.
jcgomez_j
No comments:
Post a Comment