In terms of what is good, the discussion that gave the flow of the law in the years before, during the discussion in Congress and in the following years. There was an intensity of public debate on these issues is unprecedented in the history of argentina. It seems to Me that it adds knowledge to many sectors of society as to what are the media and what interests they have. Until that time, the perspective on the media was of immaculate conception, the idea of which had no direct relationship with the economic and political game that all the institutions have. The law in itself, has goals that I defended and defend, such as the legal recognition of the non-profit Organizations can have access to radio and television licenses . In addition to establishing limits to moderate the concentration of ownership. Another positive aspect is that it established a mandate of pluralism and diversity to the means of the state, that is to say, that the state media were not government and also established production quotas national, federal, independent, as a requirement for holding a license, which aimed to decentralize the strong geographic concentration that we have in the production of audiovisual media in Argentina.
No comments:
Post a Comment