I have never argued that the media of the UNAM have to be led by its graduates; it is desirable that they have some of our careers Communication, but do not share that kind of academic chauvinism which means that only our alumni should lead the university departments, and which, incidentally, it has not been what has defined the history of television college, “said Raul Trejo Delarbre during his lecture television educates or entertains? issued under the cycle television, healthy moribund , which develops in the FIL Mining
the academic said that the title of the symposium argues with a ghost. “no one, or almost no one says that television is dying, but clearly that has been partially offset by other means with which contemporizes “adding that public television should be different from the commercial, and it is therefore necessary to have autonomy, plus it must have editorial independence and citizen participation.
the formula for ensure that editorial independence, he added, it is that the directors of Radio and TV UNAM were appointed by the university Council, because “otherwise the university will not comply with new federal regulations on broadcasting”.
he Ensured that TV UNAM need to get closer to what the university, plus it is not that the channel offers distance learning courses or that it is intended to reinforce the screen lessons taught in the classroom, since that television can support teaching but their tasks are different.
“television is not to educate, at least in the sense of this term schooled. Its primary functions are entertainment and information, but has pedagogical consequences, especially in the solidification or the devastation of the political culture. So the dilemma posed by this particular session does not exist: television is to entertain and, I add, to inform, and how as do help or undermine citizenship education, “he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment